Palliative care is provided concurrently with all other appropriate treatments including those directed at cure and life prolongation by a team of physicians, nurses, social workers, chaplains, and other relevant healthcare professionals as needed [ 1 ]. Delivery of healthcare in the USA is influenced by a complex public—private payment structure. Whereas healthcare reimbursement in many countries is a mix of public and private insurers, the USA is singularly unique in the extent to which the private sector dominates public reimbursement mechanisms.
Even under Medicare, however, private insurers have an influential role owing to their administration of Medicare Advantage Plans described below.
The overall goals of the PPACA are to decrease the number of Americans without health insurance, improve healthcare outcomes and delivery, and lower costs [ 3 ]. Employer-sponsored insurance covers most Americans [ 2 ]. Employers provide insurance as part of their employees benefit package with the price of the premium born by both the employer the majority and employee.
Insurance plans are administered by private companies, both for-profit and not-for-profit. Prior to the PPACA, benefits and the degree of cost sharing co-pays and deductibles varied widely across insurance companies and within individual plans. Coverage of prescription drugs is not addressed by the PPACA and remains under the purview of individual plans with some plans covering prescription drugs and some not with substantial variability in cost-sharing arrangements.
The individual market covers the part of the population who are under age 65 and self-employed or retired. A key component of the PPACA is the requirement for individuals without employersponsored health insurance to purchase coverage or face fines beginning in [ 3 ]. The PPACA has established health insurance exchanges in each State that offer a marketplace where individuals and small businesses can compare policies and premiums, and buy insurance [ 3 ].
Medicare is a federal program that covers individuals ages 65 and over, some persons with disabilities, and persons with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Federal income taxes, a payroll, and individual enrollee premiums finance Medicare. Medicare has three components: Medicare Part A covers hospital services and hospice; Medicare Part B covers physician services, and Medicare Part D offers a prescription drug benefit.
Medicare Part C refers to Medicare advantage — for-profit and not-forprofit insurers that administer Medicare benefits under a capitated system [ 4 ]. Gaps in Medicare coverage are considerable and include incomplete coverage for skilled nursing facilities, incomplete prescription coverage, incomplete coverage for home care and long-term care, and no coverage for dental, hearing, vision, or long-term care [ 4 ].
Thus, the majority of enrollees obtain supplemental insurance. Medicaid is a program designed for those with low income and the disabled that is jointly funded by the States and federal government. By federal law, States must cover very poor pregnant women, children, elderly, disabled, and parents. Childless adults are not covered, and many poor individuals make too much to qualify for Medicaid.
The States and the District of Columbia are responsible for administering the Medicaid program; as such, there are effectively 51 different Medicaid programs in the country. Medicaid offers a fairly comprehensive set of benefits, including prescription drugs and longterm care. Despite this, many enrollees have difficulty in finding providers that accept Medicaid because of its low reimbursement rate. A hospice demonstration program was initiated in followed by the creation of the Medicare hospice benefit in [ 7 ].
Modern US palliative care was developed within academic medical centers in the early s based upon the recognition that the core principles of hospice care should be applied to all with serious illness, irrespective of prognosis [ 10 ].
Spurred by studies [ 11 ] that documented major inadequacies in care for the seriously ill, legalization of assisted suicide in Oregon in [ 7 ], and infusion of hundreds of millions of dollars by US philanthropic foundations to improve care of the seriously ill [ 7 ], palliative care teams rapidly expanded in US hospitals [ 12 ].
Additionally, in , palliative medicine was recognized as establishment of a formal subspecialty by 10 parent boards of the American Board of Medical Specialties in [ 15 ].
As of , the only pathway to Board Certification is through an accredited American Council of Graduate Medical Education fellowship training program following board certification in a qualifying parent specialty.
To date, models of palliative care delivery have been relatively few, delivered by specialist teams, and influenced overwhelmingly by reimbursement systems [ 7 ].
Home-based and nursing home care has been primarily limited to dying patients and their families provided under hospice. Interdisciplinary teams providing specialist-level palliative care to all patients with serious illness irrespective of prognosis have been largely confined to hospitals.
Patients living in the community who are not hospice eligible have had few palliative care options available to them and very little palliative care is provided by generalists. The environment, however, is changing as the provisions of the PPACA provide fiscal and quality incentives to deliver palliative care outside of hospitals leading to the development of community palliative care models that include primary, secondary, and tertiary models of palliative care delivery [ 16 ].
In addition to Medicare, the cost of hospice is covered by Medicaid and most private insurance plans using the Medicare eligibility criteria. Thirty-seven percent of patients have a primary diagnosis of cancer [ 17 ]. Unlike traditional fee-forservice medicine, hospice services are provided under a daily capitated per-diem rate that is set by local coverage determinants [ 8 ]. Hospice structures and processes of care are regulated under the Medicare benefit [ 8 ].
Additionally, hospices must meet state licensing requirements and many volunteer to obtain accreditation through organizations such as the Joint Commission or other similar agencies. Services that must be provided include medical, nursing, social work, chaplaincy, and bereavement support to family members. On average, hospice is able to provide 20 h per week in personal care needs through a home health aide. In actuality, there is a wide variation in the provision of hospice services. Whereas all hospices provide the core package of Medicare services, size, tax status, and geography appear to be associated with service delivery.
Larger not-for-profit hospices providing considerably more additional services than for-profit or smaller programs [ 18 — 20 ]. Variability in case-mix e. Hospice care has been associated with significant improvement in the quality of dying symptom control , family and patient satisfaction with care, reduced aggressiveness of care at the end-oflife and reductions in the incidence of posttraumatic stress disorder and prolonged grief disorder as compared with those receiving usual care [ 21 , 22 ].
Additionally, recently published data suggest that hospices result in substantial cost savings to Medicare and reductions in healthcare utilization e.
Barriers to the universal provision of hospice care include the inability to accurately prognosticate noncancer diagnoses, the requirement to relinquish expensive but often beneficial treatments radiation therapy, palliative chemotherapy, blood transfusions because such treatments are either forbidden under the benefit or prohibitively expensive given the hospice per diem, and the linkage in the minds of clinicians and patients of hospice with the end-oflife [ 25 ].
As a result, many patients who could benefit from the comprehensive care that hospice provides are not eligible under the current program [ 26 ]. Even those for whom disease-directed treatments are no longer beneficial may refuse to enroll in hospice because of its association with death and dying [ 26 ].
The development of palliative care services has been largely influenced by the US fee-for-service system. Unlike the ambulatory care settings, hospitals receive a lump sum Diagnosisrelated Group payment for an episode of patient care [ 28 ].
Thus, interventions like palliative care that reduce overall patient care costs for hospitals improve profit margins. The two primary models of palliative care that exist within hospitals are interdisciplinary consultation teams and inpatient units. Your palliative care team collaborates with your regular doctors to ensure your care is well-coordinated.
Explore Mayo Clinic studies of tests and procedures to help prevent, detect, treat or manage conditions. Palliative care care at Mayo Clinic.
Mayo Clinic does not endorse companies or products. Advertising revenue supports our not-for-profit mission. Check out these best-sellers and special offers on books and newsletters from Mayo Clinic Press. This content does not have an English version. This content does not have an Arabic version. Overview Palliative care is specialized medical care that focuses on providing patients relief from pain and other symptoms of a serious illness, no matter the diagnosis or stage of disease.
Request an Appointment at Mayo Clinic. Share on: Facebook Twitter. Show references Get palliative care. Center to Advance Palliative Care. Accessed Oct. National consensus project for quality palliative care. Kamal AF, et al. Palliative care consultations in patients with cancer: A Mayo Clinic 5-year review. Journal of Oncology Practice. Palliative care and end-of-life hospice. Rochester, Minn. Kelley AS, et al.
In most cases, ESRD care is delivered in free-standing dialysis clinics that are disconnected geographically and administratively with local hospitals, primary care providers, and non-nephrology subspecialists. Accordingly, patients with ESRD are more likely to receive intensive care at the end of life compared with patients dying of cancer or heart failure The Center to Advance Palliative Care defines palliative care as follows 13 :. Palliative care is specialized medical care for people with serious illnesses.
This type of care is focused on providing patients with relief from the symptoms, pain, and stress of a serious illness - whatever the diagnosis. The goal is to improve quality of life for both the patient and the family. Palliative care is provided by a team of doctors, nurses, and other specialists who work with a patient's other doctors to provide an extra layer of support. Palliative care is appropriate at any age and at any stage in a serious illness, and can be provided together with curative and life-prolonging treatment.
Translating these recommendations into practice requires a concrete set of policies aimed at increasing palliative care for patients with ESRD. This commentary outlines palliative care policies for patients with ESRD and is directed at policymakers and other stakeholders—dialysis providers, nephrology professional societies, accreditation organizations, and funding agencies—that play a key role in the delivery and determination of quality of ESRD care.
Herein we identify barriers to palliative care and suggest five policies supported by the evidence base that would promote palliative care for patients with ESRD. Palliative care and hospice programs improve value by targeting several drivers of low-value care, including financial incentives for quantity and fragmentation, financial and structural disconnects between acute and postacute care settings, and lack of training in managing patients with multiple chronic conditions with functional limitations Specialist-level palliative care is often delivered through multidisciplinary care teams that focus on treating pain and other distressing symptoms, supporting decision making, aligning treatment plans with patient goals, integrating psychosocial and spiritual needs with medical care, coordinating medical and social services, and supporting loved-ones in their caregiving roles.
There is a large body of research supporting the assertion that palliative care improves the quality of care.
Specifically, palliative care improves physical and psychosocial symptoms, patient and family satisfaction, level of practical supports in the community, and bereavement outcomes Finally, several studies suggest that palliative care may be associated with improved survival 18 — In one clinical trial of patients newly diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 lung cancer, palliative care provided in conjunction with disease-focused treatment extended survival by 2.
In other observational studies, survival was similar or longer for Medicare decedents diagnosed with a life-limiting illness who received hospice care compared with similar decedents who received usual care 18 , Whether these findings might be generalizable to ESRD is not yet known.
As an epiphenomenon of improving care, palliative care in turn results in less reliance on the most expensive settings for care: the emergency department and the acute care hospital 21 — For example, one study examined health care costs among hospitalized patients who received a palliative care consultation compared with matched patients who received usual care Several aspects of the organization of ESRD care in the United States could facilitate delivery of high-quality palliative care.
A value-based purchasing program, the Medicare ESRD Quality Incentive Program QIP , was initiated in and could serve as the framework for promoting high-value care services because providers are incented to meet certain quality targets or face financial penalties. In addition, robust quality measurement systems are in place to monitor the quality of care at the patient and facility levels. With relatively modest effort, these systems could be modified to promote and monitor the delivery of palliative care.
Finally, the elements of a multidisciplinary care team already exist in many dialysis centers. By enhancing the palliative care skills of existing teams, palliative care could be integrated into routine standard of ESRD care rather than solely relying on specialty-level palliative care teams for comanagement or consultation.
However, several barriers must be addressed in order to fully realize the potential of the existing ESRD care infrastructure. To strengthen palliative care for patients with ESRD, policies must address ways to improve access to palliative care, build capacity to deliver quality palliative care, and strengthen the evidence base upon which ESRD palliative care is practiced Table 1.
Importantly, states with the most hospice facilities per capita or the highest rates of stopping dialysis are not necessarily states with the highest rates of hospice use Utilization of palliative care also varies across hospital referral regions with available palliative care services, independent of illness severity The incidence of dialysis initiation also exhibits geographic variation, with regions that have a higher density of nephrologists also having higher incidence rates of dialysis initiation Many of these patients die in hospital and intensive care settings and withdraw from dialysis when actively dying.
They often do not receive hospice or palliative care. To address uneven access, we propose universal screening for palliative care needs. The goal of screening is to identify patients with a high burden of symptoms, family distress, or poor life expectancy who might benefit from the addition of palliative care. The method of screening need not be complex. An ESRD prognostic tool that uses the surprise question in conjunction with four other clinical variables accurately predicts 6-month mortality In a randomized clinical trial, Gade et al.
Patients randomized to palliative care consultation had significant improvements in satisfaction with care and completion of advance directives, longer hospice stays, and lower costs of care, with no significant differences in survival Standardized symptom assessments that are associated with treatment algorithms could reduce variability for care focused on quality of life For example, Weisbord et al.
The modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, the Palliative Care Outcomes Scale, and the Dialysis Symptom Index are alternative screening tools for measuring distress from physical and emotional symptoms 3 , 29 , A logical first step would be to implement universal screening during care transitions, such as at the initiation of dialysis and at admission to the hospital or nursing home.
The current QIP is based on attainment of two quality targets, one for anemia and one for dialysis dose. Beginning in , additional quality targets and reporting measures will be incorporated, and more are under consideration. To be included in the QIP, a measure must first be endorsed by the National Quality Forum NQF , which uses four criteria to evaluate a quality measure: measurement of a high-priority area, scientific acceptability, usability and relevance, and feasibility of collection.
Adapted from Weissman et al. A preliminary report of the Medicare ESRD Disease Management Demonstration Project indicated that rates of advance care planning can be increased through targeted efforts Surveys of patients with ESRD suggest that initiatives to improve advance care planning would address a high-priority unmet need Once sufficient data are accumulated on national performance, the measure could be converted from a reporting measure to a clinical target.
Given the evidence that palliative care reduces the utilization of acute care 39 — 41 , this measure, or related measures such as readmission rates would indirectly support the goal of promoting palliative care. It is also important to consider the unintended consequences that future QIP measures might have on the provision of palliative care. For example, it would seem appropriate to exclude patients who receive concurrent hospice care when assessing attainment of dialysis specific performance measures.
There currently exists a mismatch between the need for palliative care among patients with ESRD versus the capacity of the current health delivery system to address those needs. This mismatch is related to both an insufficient number of providers who are trained to deliver palliative care and the location of these providers in settings separated from the usual delivery of dialysis care.
A recent study estimated a shortfall of between and 18, palliative care specialists to meet the existing demand from hospices and hospital palliative care programs without considering additional demand from patients with ESRD These estimates, when considered in light of the projected nephrology workforce shortfall, are certainly daunting Moreover, although palliative medicine is expanding into outpatient settings, most access to palliative medicine specialists will occur in the inpatient setting and in larger medical centers in the immediate future; thus, in-person access to palliative medicine specialists at dialysis centers is likely to be limited.
0コメント